Jump to content

kohagan

Members
  • Content Count

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

kohagan last won the day on January 18 2018

kohagan had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

303 Excellent

1 Follower

About kohagan

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Existing game assets can be used in the state they're in, to be moved around and multiplied, aslong as there is no alteration or manipulation to the asset model - so no colour changes. For example if a existing rock asset is named 'rock1' and you duplicated it but made it the colour pink, then you'd have to alter the name in the asset files for it to exist, say to something like 'pinkrock1' - at this point you've created new content here, it didn't exist in the game files before. Changing the maps using the current assets within the game, no matter how much so, is still not new content. When they say content, they don't mean the volume of items added but whether its a new model asset. It's like getting a room in a house with a load of furniture in it and constantly rearranging it so the room is radically different but it's still the same items. yeah you stacked the same 3 sofas on top of each other and had both the kitchen sink and dining table hanging off the ceiling, you happen to be a wizard who can conjure up the same pieces of furniture and add them into the room but no newly designed content had been added. So the lawyers can't come knocking. New content is a brand new modelled asset or named item that we haven't seen before added to the game. Period. Now, to create a new map and release it using the same old assets, you'd have to promote it as a new map, and have to name it something, as petty as it is - the name alone would be new content, it didn't exist before, that would fall under copyright as it belongs to somebody who owns the f13 license, hence the reason it can't happen. Forest Green can't happen. The existing asset claim isn't even an argument, it's a fact.
  2. I made a cocktail of ginger powder, mint, chilli powder lemon put it in a spray bottle and sprayed the area. Then secondly went over and sprayed some anti mould bleach near any sites they may be entering from. Just make sure any food and sweet snacks are put away. That's generally why they come in to start with.
  3. Some very well thought out ideas that make sense, although I'm not really in favour of point 14, could see it making the match a little frustrating on the surface. One of the things I'd like to see is hiding spots changed so it encourages them to be used more. I'd be for it not showing at all in rage mode until the player has been in the spot for say x minute/s, so it encourages the player to keep moving whilst at the same time potentially exposing themselves to jason. Although it'd be challenging, it would be possible to go from hiding spot to hiding spot to survive the night. It would really create some cat and mouse moments and I feel It really should be a thing in this game. I also agree with the map kiosk. I don't think maps should be plentiful in cabins, scrap it all together. Kiosk only, it should be another objective.
  4. Because people can't grasp and understand the use of an already existing game asset that can be added and a new game asset which would require new modeling, which would therefore be new content.
  5. How do you kbow the ps4 numbers? Logic (whilst not fact) suggests ps4 has the most active playerbase as it dropped for psn subscribers to the tune of 36 million in october and was the third highest selling game on psn store in 2017 beating horizon Dawn and Minecraft (think about that for a moment). Even if 0.5% of all that log in and play regularly it's not bad. Just because pc format shows bad numbers for the game you can't say it's all platforms, for a start the sales for console are better than pc. It's the same with games like battlefield, pc has shit numbers and sales compared to console. To even suggest f13 numbers are the same on console as pc despite being given away to 36 million subs, isn't realistic.
  6. No it shouldn't be sped up. Jason has more than enough in his locker of death to catch counselors. I think his jog and walks represents what he does in the movies well, it would start to look silly with OTT speed walking.
  7. I think Crackers and flare guns should stun at rage. They can't endlessly be used for bullying jason and at the same time still gives counselors a bit of help in that time period. Seems fair to me.
  8. 'Excuse with the lawsuit' Is it time to bang my head against a wall yet?
  9. Making a port of a game with exactly the same assets as the other versions isn't new content.
  10. I've never seen any game hacked on ps4. There's no video proof at all.
  11. **spoiler** I really didn't like the doctor killing the cop, it was unnecessary and I felt a bad move. I get what they were trying to do with his character arc but it was highly unbelievable and ultimately pointless other than to shift Michael into another location. For or me there should be only one killer and that's Michael.
  12. The best thing to do If the lawsuit settled would be a friday the 13th part 2. I mean games like cod and battlefield get new games every couple of years, so why not. There would have to be a big focus on different game modes to set it apart and make it different to this game. What we have now could be classic mode and maps. More sp Challenges (with a skip button) I'd also look at more customisable Jason's and counselors, different perk system - make it a lot more interesting on that front. So basically more content, modes and refined gameplay would make a part 2 worthwhile.
×
×
  • Create New...