Jump to content

TMSStoneaxe

Members
  • Content Count

    203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TMSStoneaxe


  1. 7 hours ago, TheRockstarKnight said:

    While it's not a huge thing for me, I fully support this.

    It shouldn't be that much harder than it was for them to give Roy two jumpsuits and it'd be kind of cool.

    yeah it's not a big deal but i feel it could be a faster change than most the things they do and it'd give us options and it'd be a change that makes everyone a bit happier, like roys clothing options


  2. I feel there should be an option now that weapon swapping is a thing i think it'd be cool to have an option for all jasons to make their masks eye/hockey mask holes blackened out like part 7 (and an option to make it so you can see through them maybe for ones like 7 and ? i feel the dark holes makes them look better/more threatening good example being the part 3 picture at the end of the new trailer and some of the fan made versions on the gmod steam workshop, itd give people more options and it'd make some of them more movie accurate like part 6 who spent MOST of his movie with eye holes darkened like the undead jasons do or part 9 who had a few scenes with his unbroken mask eye hole darkened and in the early half the movie where that broken mark was there he had both darkened, idk it just looks better imo and i think a lot of people MIGHT agree since in most of the marketing you cant see his eyes showing thats the more attractive looking version, and this way it'd give everyone a choice

    this was a minor nitpick/feature idea and i hope they think it through/some people agree with me

    • Like 1

  3. what if about the whole savini thing the farm pitchfork shared some of the more basic kills with savinis like the turn around stab in the back of the head but they had their own more complicated kills that utilize the differences between the weapons that way savini backers get something unique besides a cool looking, but meh stats jason and the non savini backers get a pitchfork with some of the kills

     


  4. 23 minutes ago, TiffanyCakes said:

    Soooo Jason can grab me when I’m existing  the climbing animation now?Lmao they keep making it easier for you guys ..I heard y’all want stalk at the beggining of the game as well...Learn how to play and quit crying about Jason not being powerful enough .

    but jasons supposed to be strong af wtf is goin through your head dude XD


  5. There aren't many Jasons left.  And it is because they're one of the main appeals is why I don't think they should be sold.

     

    Produces longevity in the base game.  That's important.  You'd wanna make the free content extend the game's life as much as you can; everything secondary, cosmetics for example, should follow suit with possible micro-transactions.

     

    When particular characters or maps are locked behind a paywall, you lock it's longevity behind a paywall.  That doesn't sit well, especially with indie companies.

     

    Blizzard made that smart move with Overwatch.

     

    Primary: Characters (Counselor and Jason), Maps, Singleplayer Missions, New Gameplay Content.

     

    Secondary: Cosmetics, Weapons, anything not affecting how the game is played or affecting XP development

    i still think the ones that arent quite like the rest should cost money

     

    Examples i have for these being

     

    Roy Uber Pamela Nes and anymore original ones they have

     

    (on the subject me and guys in the discord had some ideas for other ones to add that i shall add to the list)

     

    Hallucination Jason from part 5           Hallucination Pamela from part 3


  6. They don't need to make money on subscriptions alone.

     

    You gotta remember; yes they gotta make money but they also need to keep customers happy.  Sure many people here on the forum would admit to buying almost everything they have, but they need to make things affordable.

     

    The life of the game is required to coincide with the financial aspect.  Because you cannot make money for long if you force people to continue to empty their pockets for you without something to keep people engaged.

     

    That's why the Subscription idea isn't meant for games like this.  You're paying to play a game that isn't large enough to render that justifiable and won't be as consistantly updated as MMOs.

     

    However, we don't want to pull Call of Duty and have map packs to separate playerbase.  It's basically having people pay to play with their friends.  That doesn't do a small Indie company like this justice, in fact it would hurt their rep and the rep for this game.  So selling maps is off the table, especially considering there are only three thus far.

     

    It would come down to future payable DLC.

     

    What I would do is have Jasons and Maps be free generally speaking.  (I would let Uber Jason be sold since many don't really wanna see him but many do so it splits it up so only people who really want Uber Jason will play as him by purchasing him, I would say for the same price as Savini's Jason)

     

    I would focus a lot of the main continuous financial flow to make up for this in Cosmetics, mainly counselors, and have them in packs that fit all counselors or individually sold.  Another thing I would sell occasionally would be more weapons for Jasons that are already in the game, weapons that didn't make it in the game.  I would make that a decent hunk of money.  Not all of them, but a select few.

     

    __

     

    So lets say we want a new weapon for a Jason; a Hammer, for the purposes of this example.

     

    It would first specify which Jason types can use the Hammer.  Part 2, 3, 6, and 8.  With each Jason, they get it's several kills along with one unique kill for each Jason that uses it.

     

    I would set the default price at $0.99, and for every Jason character that gets to use it, the price increases by one dollar.  So if those four Jasons can use the Hammer, the price of the hammer would be $4.99 (excluding tax).  If it's a weapon usable by just one Jason, its $1.99.

     

    But lets say you want to purchase the weapon for just Part 2.  Well, we can make that happen.  If you wanna purchase the Hammer for just Part 2 and not 3, 6, and 8, you save money.  You only have to pay $1.99, because if you play Part 2 religiously and won't touch 3, 6, or 8, then that'd be fair to not have the person pay more for just one weapon, thus you make it more available to people.

     

    Hammer for one Jason: $1.99

     

    Hammer for all four Jasons: $4.99

     

     

    Now lets use another example... Bonesaw, maybe.

     

    All the Jasons in the game currently can use the Bonesaw.

     

    So the price of the Bonesaw would be $7.99.

     

    But if you wanna buy it for just one Jason, it'd be $1.99.

     

    And we do this with every weapon added for Jasons already in the game.  Of course this can be coincided with the occasional free weapon, but overall I see no reason not to do this. 

     

    Waddya think?

    i think jasons should cost money personally they're one of the main appeals for the game so i dont see why they wouldnt

    • Like 1

  7. I getcha.

     

    My concern is really to continuity of the game above all else. I know it's gotta be funded somehow.

     

    Maybe they already have plans/ideas on how to do that which none of us have thought of? Who knows.

     

    For now, I'll be happy with whatever is in game to start when it comes out.

    one thing i realised we all forgot to realise as well is that maps also have a limited ammount just like jason skins so if they implement the rest of the maps then we don't have to worry about this issue from that point on


  8. I think that what I said is the way to go, doesn't mean I'm right or it's what they'll do. Likewise with what you have said. Neither of us are the devs so really it's all speculation.

     

    We'll have to wait and see what they do.

     

    For now, we can just agree to disagree on the matter. Cool?

    yes ok but one thing i do wanna bring back up is the fact that recently they made another 500,000 from backerkit making them above 2 mill in cash budget so i feel if they put out a few maps with that then they shouldn't have to worry about wasting the budget on the free stuff


  9. Well i didnt tell you to kill yourself. Saying an idea is bad isnt as "harsh" as saying stupid. Imo. Even at saying something is bad is subjective.

    well to me calling an idea stupid is just as bad as calling it a bad idea so if i offended you then you need to calm down considering if i actually hated it as much as you seemed to take offence to the word stupid then i would have said something much worse in reality by your definition of badness it's just bad


  10. I understand you're only 17 ... so let's explain how math works. Making new Jason's ... what maybe 4-5 more? That's not funding making THOSE Jason's, plus maps PLUS keeping the servers up. 

     

    Backerkit is pointless after release and pretty much whoever was going to fund it, already has. 

     

    If and when you ever run a business, perhaps you'll understand how it works. If every business gave away everything for free because people didn't want to pay for it, it wouldn't be called business, it'd be called charity.

     

    I don't want to pay my mortgage every month, I don't want to pay a cable bill for a shit ton of channels I never watch just to get the few that I do watch. But that's life, you want a service or a product ... you pay for it.

     

    Your model is convenient for you, but unrealistic in practice.

    let me counter your points suvivor clothing packs excist and they might add kill packs an item that unlike jasons can be added infinitley as tom savini created countless pages of kill animation ideas already and of course these being let's say $8 each i dont see why they cant afford maps considering MOST fans of the game so far like me are willing to throw money at the screen for any in game dlc and the fact that they probably still have $500,000 at LEAST of budget left considering they gained that much through backerkit since they first said they only need console cert meaning they probably aren't spending as much of that budget anymore as they aren't actually MAKING the game anymore ,meaning they not only still have a decent ammount of budget left for making map dlc but add on the upcoming backerkit money from REALLY hardcore dedicated fans who will donate till the end of the games life and then the money from dlcs

     

    so i say this game can sustain itself pretty well i dont remember if i mentioned new people buying the game in there but if not that should ALSO help

     

     

    I would also like to point out you're the only one here insulting others and acting childish by doing that so if you don't calm down i shall report you to jpops or ben or someone and get you banned do you think a dev team as nice as them will allow your behavior


  11. It helps noone to call things "stupid". Why the hell do you feel the need to defend negativity and discount every damn thing? Instead of either not saying something at all, or standing up for whats right, you come and defend this. The fucks wrong with you? Constantly on my threads with the shit. Never productive.

    to be perfectly honest i don't view stupid as anymore negative than saying it was a bad idea then again i've been online long enough to find kill yourself as a mild insult

×
×
  • Create New...