Jump to content

Ralph_E_Fresh

Members
  • Content Count

    328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ralph_E_Fresh

  1. 1. Indentured servitude, they weren't slaves they were workers, and they lived equally with their employer, not only did they have to pay them but provide them food and a place to live, that's better than modern employment. 2, it isnt abhorrent as refuted above, but playing your games and pretending it is, what Objectively makes it abhorrent? Without God there is no Objective Morality 3, Incorrect, Levticus is specifically for the Leviathans, not all of humanity, they had these very specific prohibitions for a reason. For general laws you're going to have to go back to Genesis 9:3 where God/Jesud Christ says you may eat any animal, so yes you could eat pork and shrimp. The Law is summed up by Jesus Christ in Matthew 7:12, "Treat others the same way you could want them to treat you", which sums up The Law, and sums up the 10 commandments. 3, As far as "homosexuals" that's never condemned, being gay isn't a sin, the word for the passage in Hebrew of Levitcus means anal sex, this was to the Leviathans, especially when it came to worshipping false gods. Lumping specific prohibitions/laws for Leviathans as the Law is a fallacy, it's as fallacious as lumping in interpolation or mistranslation with original text
  2. In this entire illogical diatribe, you didn't refute a thing and simply demonstrated that the facts are for whatever the reasoning, inconvenienent for you. The universe is fine tuned, Objective Morality requires an Objective authority. I have no feelings as to what I accept or decline, if something is illogical then I reject it, hence why I rejected atheism after intensive study, it is simply unscientific. In no way scientifically, morally, historically and even logically is it even plausible for God/Jesus Christ not to exist. Atheism is a fairy tale of wild imagination, the idea that any unconscious property could produce a conscious property when it lacks the properties of it(mindless cannot produce a mind) is utterly absurd.
  3. After all that's happened with this game since launch, not only will I not buy it, I recommend others not to. As for proof of whether it happened or not, it certainly did happen and is scientifically proven.
  4. Its been a ride, I'm happy that the defenders of this game saw the light.
  5. Seeing as they showed photos of the spaceship, I want to see photos of Camp Forest green, the Shepard residence, Manhattan and the Lazarus boat that were all going to come out.
  6. You didn't get a game based on Friday the 13th films, where's Pamela, where's camp forest green, where's Tina, where's the Shepard map? The Lazarus boat? Manhattan? The game is incomplete, forget about future/extra content, they didn't even make basic content. They fix all the bugs and the players will still leave. This game in it's multiplayer state won't continue with a low amount of players who only care about bugs(as if that's what's gonna make the game fun) over those who are burnt out, wanted new content and left, those people are the majority of the playerbase, hence why so many played each time an update with content came out.
  7. Whether this legal claim is an excuse to stop producing content or whether it's legit and they can't make future content until the lawsuit finishes I predict this happening. Here's a bold prediction: After the lawsuit finishes, even if they don't return to make content immediately after the lawsuit, they eventually will return as whatever projects they have after this won't reach the level of success as this project did they will return to this project and continuing building and releasing content.
  8. That game, which was on nes has nothing to do with this game, that game was made by ljn, they're not gonna be able to offer the film experience on that platform. Current gen? No excuse, even in the last 3 gens there wouldn't be an excuse for only 5 maps.
  9. From General FAQ by Ben, first paragraph: "...when we got the rights to Friday the 13th we knew we had to make the game better, with more features and content that complements the franchise. To put it bluntly, we wanted this game to be every bit as big as the franchise on which it is based." Easy question for you truth, Is this game a true Friday the 13th film series video game adaptation?(at least parts 1-8) Yes or No If Yes them every map from at the very least parts 1-8 should be in the game. If not then it's a demo/incomplete
  10. It does, otherwise it's a demo. What the game doesn't need is dlc/extra content. Those maps and etc they left out weren't extra content, they were basic content that should've been on disc. If anything the biggest bug fix needed is the missing maps from this franchise. Without that we have a demo. Extra content would've been something like a custom map and etc.
  11. The priorities should've been in this order: 1. Complete the game/basic film series content(each map and skin from each movie under the original series) 2. Fix bugs 3. Extra content
  12. Thats the terms your company came up with, not something I would phrase it as. Anyways point still stands, this game doesn't cover the full Friday the 13th film franchise, there's no camp Forest green, no Shepard residence, no Manhattan, no Lazarus ship, no Tina Shepard, and no Pamela as playable character. This game merely covers parts 2-5 with some asesthetics from parts 1 and 6-8.
  13. I don't want content every month or week or etc, I simply want a full game. If this happened after all the maps from each movie were in the game, I wouldn't care, I'm not this content hungry dude these folks are trying to make me out to be, I simply want the full gaming experience, not a demo. This game doesn't even have the replayability of a ps1 game. Think about it, this game only covers parts 2-5 from the film, Doesn't cover part 1 as there's no pamela, doesn't cover parts 6-8 as theres no maps from those movies. It would be nice to have extra content like custom maps but I let that slide since that's extra, I'm not ungrateful, I paid 40 for a gaming experience of the films and only recieved a demo. They fix all the bugs? Fine, but I'll still be left with a bug free demo, getting this game out with the complete content should've been the priority, then bugs and then dlc/extra content.
  14. Without more content this is a demo/sample f13th experience, the franchise didn't consist of merely 5 maps and a few skins. I can get more replay value from a ps1 game.
  15. Yeah and those games I played as a kid prior internet had content to last year's, not 5 maps and a few skins. That's why this comparison doesn't work, I'm not some kid who expects content every week and etc, I'm not into video gaming like that anymore, I only play a section number of games now, I simply want a full game with full content, not a demo that has little replay value.
  16. This x10, this game should've been released with a map for each skin. However I was patient and gave the game and devs a chance, instead we got stuff like emotes, clothes and etc If they knew they had to get as much content before June 2018, then bugs shouldn't have been a priority, it shouldn't have even been a concern until after all content was released. They should've released it all buggy to make the date and then fix them after
  17. Whether they're lying about this or not, whether Cunningham wins or Miller wins, whether all bugs are fixed or not ... There is no excuse for there not to be future content release after this lawsuit is over, whether it be a month or a year. Whether you support every little thing the devs do or whether you don't, this remains, there's no excuse if they truly care about this game.
  18. I'd rather wait for a full game with full content than play a bug free demo.
  19. Any derivative work and it's terms granted prior to termination continue after termination. Future content is one of the terms.
  20. JPops closed my thread with this statement: " I understand that people are upset, however there are plenty of already open threads to discuss the subject. Speculation on legal matters does no one justice and frankly unless you were on the team, then you don't know what the situation is. Copyright law is pretty tricky and can get very messy, very quickly. Trust me, if there was a way around it this would not be the current situation. " I won't keep silent so let's continue this here terms and works granted prior to termination continue after termination Unless theres a cease and desist on the game then they can continue to release and work on future content.
  21. This isn't true, future/new content isn't a New Separate Derivative work made after the termination, it's a term made Before the termination, this it still continues after termination. Whether future content is a term or a derivative work in of itself, it was granted prior to termination and therefore remains in effect after termination.
  22. Don't really watch law and order. I'm no lawyer but when there's something clearly stated in law then it's clearly stated, denying a fact presented because I'm not a lawyer is an appeal to authority fallacy, I don't need to be a lawyer to point out something. Unless the devs get an order directed to them, then they can continue future content. If that jason toy is released in September then I will believe this as a lie, as that is future content as well.
  23. If you believe that they would stop releasing content without any court order then you're not understanding You don't automatically sue, you get warned to cease and desist, unless they have a cease and desist there's no argument. Lawyers would have no way of warning someone unless there was a cease and desist. New content is what keeps the game going, if you think bug fixes will make everyone happy and pretend people won't get burnt out(especially when dedicated servers come out and there's continuous uninterrupted gameplay) with the same repetitive content then you are mistaken
  24. No, I'm actually correct, they can continue to make content under that law. A cease and desist is where they wouldn't even if they're in the right, nobody argued against that, hence the thread topic as that's the only way they would be legally prevented.
  25. Lawsuit has absolutely no affect on game as it was a term granted prior to termination, terms made prior continue after termination. Future content is one of those terms.
×
×
  • Create New...