Jump to content

Photo

Future Jason Picks


  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

#41
JasonVsWindows

JasonVsWindows

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

After looking at some toys on google I would like to suggest Roy get hedge clippers instead of a meat clever. Can have some fun with that thing.

 

 Pic      Pic2


200_s.gif#26


#42
CrazyRalph

CrazyRalph

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,900 posts
And instead of throwing darts, give him road flares (in mouths)
  • JasonVsWindows likes this

#43
JasonVsWindows

JasonVsWindows

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Or we can use the road flare and the belt kills as his replacements for the super stength kills


  • CrazyRalph likes this

200_s.gif#26


#44
dmack621

dmack621

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts
  • LocationNJ

No packs please.

 

I do not want a SINGLE map to be payable.  Jason models and cosmetics I'm all for, hell, even WEAPONS I'm willing to pay for.  Not maps.

 

It would basically be "I'm going to have you pay to NOT play with your friends."

 

No map packs.  They divide the playerbase far more.  Single payments for things that don't divide the playerbase is fine.  I don't see how that would ever divide the playerbase unless you are dead-set on making people pay for maps.  If you don't have pay for maps, you're golden, don't even have to worry about it.

 

But paying for maps would murder this game.  Especially considering there are only three, and "competition" like Dead By Daylight hand those out for free, albeit simple and small ones.

 

Last Year isn't going to be far behind F13th.  I wish both games luck but no doubt there will be competition for those who did not break for F13th.

 

Skins, Jasons, and Jason weapons will do well.  Making others pay for maps will kill it.  Introducing them only in packs will assure this game's destruction.

 

You realize that it costs money to create new maps, right? Games that launch new maps as dlc you have to pay for. No company ever, in their right mind would lose money to give you free maps simply because you don't want to pay for them.

 

To release dlc it has to be profitable and sensible for them to do so. You're trying to say dlc maps will kill the game simply because you want it free. CoD has dlc map packs and they do just fine.

 

If you don't want to pay for extra maps, you don't have to, just don't get them. But asking the devs to take a hit so that you can avoid paying for anything is just ridiculous.

 

That's like expecting you cable company to upgrade you to their new highest speed for free just because it wasn't an available speed before ... it's never going to happen. Oh wait ... Burger King launches a new sandwich a week after you were there. "Let me get it free, I didn't see it here last week, shouldn't have to pay for something new when I paid to eat here last week." Dude, you crack me up.

 

DLC = cost. That's just how it works.


  • The Razor's Edge likes this
Posted Image

#45
FreakyFrank1

FreakyFrank1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts
  • LocationCanada,Quebec

You realize that it costs money to create new maps, right? Games that launch new maps as dlc you have to pay for. No company ever, in their right mind would lose money to give you free maps simply because you don't want to pay for them.

 

To release dlc it has to be profitable and sensible for them to do so. You're trying to say dlc maps will kill the game simply because you want it free. CoD has dlc map packs and they do just fine.

 

If you don't want to pay for extra maps, you don't have to, just don't get them. But asking the devs to take a hit so that you can avoid paying for anything is just ridiculous.

 

That's like expecting you cable company to upgrade you to their new highest speed for free just because it wasn't an available speed before ... it's never going to happen. Oh wait ... Burger King launches a new sandwich a week after you were there. "Let me get it free, I didn't see it here last week, shouldn't have to pay for something new when I paid to eat here last week." Dude, you crack me up.

 

DLC = cost. That's just how it works.

Of course,but the thing is that it's not the money the problem,it's that the playerbase will be divided depending on this player having this map or that player having that map.

 

% of peoples having no dlc maps  VS  % of peoples having a few dlc maps  VS  % of peoples having all dlc maps

 

I play COD myself from time to time and i already know how much the playerbase for that franchise is divided,by wich COD games and wich DLC.

 

And from what i've seen,it seem that there's more peoples playing without the Dlc than peoples playing with all of the Dlc.

 

For exemple,i go on Black Ops 1 with all DLC downloaded and there are specific times of the day where it take awhile for me to be in a session or start a session of Hardcore,heck even certain game modes are barely played nowadays like Capture the Flag wich only a few peoples seem to play late at night,so it took me awhile to get those 15 capture the flag and return it to my team flag so i could unlock the pro version of the marathon perk.

 

Heck someone even helped me to fasten the process,by taking the flag,bringing it back to our flag,then killing himself with a grenade so i could take it.

 

I wouldnt be surprised if by deleting my Dlc download and playing without them,i would see a lot more peoples.

 

Also the cable company and burger king speech is not really a good exemple,just saying...


'Good,Bad,im the guy with the gun'.


#46
dmack621

dmack621

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts
  • LocationNJ

There's not much that can be done about that though, man.

 

Outside of not releasing ANY dlc. I mean, dlc is going to have a cost, some people will buy it, some won't. There's just not a way around that.

 

But we can't expect that new content be supplied to us after release for free. If triple A games are charging for content and they have huge budgets, how do you think it's gonna work for an indy game?

 

There's not just some endless supply of cash to produce these things so there's going to be cost, and there should be.

 

As far as dividing the community ... there's many things that will do that before any dlc is even thought of.

 

We're divided by platforms XB1,PS4,PC.  We're divided by fans, casual gamers. We're divided by timezones as a thread on here already made mention of when trying to establish a UK group for playing together.

 

Yet we understand that no game is going to be cross platform because the companies involved are in direct competition with each other. We don't wanna play with reddit users and people who will spend the whole game complaining, and we understand that timezones are just going to determine who you get to play with, and when.

 

So why then would dlc be any different? Some people can/will pay for it, some people cannot/won't pay for it. It's no different than any other division. We'll all have our groups no matter what, and tbh any groups that you do form you should have those players on your friends list so that even if they don't get new dlc and you do, you guys can still play together on what they do have.


  • The Razor's Edge likes this
Posted Image

#47
The Razor's Edge

The Razor's Edge

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts
  • LocationTennessee

I would hope the results from the official poll are used, meaning Uber Jason and Part IV come first. Then, go from there.

 

Also, if Roy from Part V is added - I don't think Pamela Voorhees' voice should be overheard when you're playing as him.


PSN: TheRazorsEdge22

 

f13sig_MM.jpg


#48
Ja1862

Ja1862

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts

I still want Pamela Voorhees added, it does not feel like a Friday the 13th game without her added in as the original killer. Have a special 1979 mode added in so you can play as her hunting the counselors in a stealthy way across the CCL Part 1 map. Add objectives like vehicle sabotage, cut phone lines, cut the power by cutting off generator, ect.


Pam dlc and more councolers like - stoner, bitchy girl, boy next door, biker, female head councillor etc etc

That is what I wanna see

#49
TMSStoneaxe

TMSStoneaxe

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 194 posts
guys you can't make map dlc unless your game has a huge playerbase like cod cod is one of the only games that survived division of playerbase through map dlc

I also want pamela and roy pamela being the harder of the 2 to add so she would probably be much later down the line
  • The Phanthom Nico likes this

tumblr_oj0jj7ttFT1rp0vkjo1_500.gif 

I'm about as stupid as most people online but not as stupid as this gif 


#50
JPops

JPops

    Slasher

  • Administrators
  • 1,933 posts
TMSStoneaxe a double post? I do not like to but I am going to start handing out warnings to those who refuse to follow the rules. I don't mind helping people out here and there but this is a daily occurrence with some of you who are long time forum users. Please use caution when posting and use the edit button.

I have merged your post.

Posted Image


#51
dmack621

dmack621

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts
  • LocationNJ

That's the thing, this is a crowd funded game. In order for them to release more content, it has to make financial sense to.

 

In order to sustain the game for those of us who are diehard (if you look at the backer total from KS and BK) that is going to be the main player base. We may grab some more after release who just simply never heard about it, but the main base is already here.

 

How do you maintain an online multiplayer?

 

Charge for dlc or charge per month subsciptions.

 

And before anyone screams about it, most predominantly online games do this. Final Fantasy Online has a subscription. DC Universe Online etc etc. 

 

Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with it. I'd rather the game remain out and online active than it have to shut down because there is no cashflow to keep it going.

 

It's just simple economics.


Posted Image

#52
TMSStoneaxe

TMSStoneaxe

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 194 posts

That's the thing, this is a crowd funded game. In order for them to release more content, it has to make financial sense to.

 

In order to sustain the game for those of us who are diehard (if you look at the backer total from KS and BK) that is going to be the main player base. We may grab some more after release who just simply never heard about it, but the main base is already here.

 

How do you maintain an online multiplayer?

 

Charge for dlc or charge per month subsciptions.

 

And before anyone screams about it, most predominantly online games do this. Final Fantasy Online has a subscription. DC Universe Online etc etc. 

 

Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with it. I'd rather the game remain out and online active than it have to shut down because there is no cashflow to keep it going.

 

It's just simple economics.

i was thinking they could have backerkit stay up after release and shit to fund more maps and such or they could make it so dlcs cost slightly more than they need to so when people pay for new jasons and such some of the money goes torwards maps


tumblr_oj0jj7ttFT1rp0vkjo1_500.gif 

I'm about as stupid as most people online but not as stupid as this gif 


#53
dmack621

dmack621

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts
  • LocationNJ

i was thinking they could have backerkit stay up after release and shit to fund more maps and such or they could make it so dlcs cost slightly more than they need to so when people pay for new jasons and such some of the money goes torwards maps

That would be dependent on how many people purchase the dlc.

 

It's all dependent on demand when it comes down to it.

 

But if you look at Kickstarter and backerkit there's about 50k backers in total. Take that as our baseline. The majority of these people are serious Friday fans and they want this game.

 

Being conservative with numbers here but let's say in first 6 months of release we add another 50k ... number might be more but we're going to go on solid base here. If we added 200k and 50k stuck around that is a fairly safe number. So you have now a solid 100k, out of those let's say 1/3 is strictly single player/offline,

 

So we're at 65k players on the servers, diehards and people who just found the game to be f'n amazing. 

 

Out of that, who's gonna buy all the dlc? Probably not everyone. Maybe half MIGHT buy all of it, 1/4 is probably more realistic. Because even though everyone of the 65k may LOVE the game, they may not all love every dlc or want it. So 21k buy dlc ... that's not funding very much. It's certainly not funding future dlc beyond that because ... maintaining the game.

 

HOWEVER, if those 65k who absolutely love the game paid say $10 per month subscription (pretty normal for most online subscription games) that would maintain the servers, provide for some dlc (which then we could get as just added) and provide a profit which makes it worthwhile to continue.

 

Like I said, for all I know we could have much higher numbers than that as far as players. I'm going barebones here as in the worst case scenario. Either way, maintaining, supporting the game and providing future content all require funding.


Posted Image

#54
TMSStoneaxe

TMSStoneaxe

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 194 posts

That would be dependent on how many people purchase the dlc.

 

It's all dependent on demand when it comes down to it.

 

But if you look at Kickstarter and backerkit there's about 50k backers in total. Take that as our baseline. The majority of these people are serious Friday fans and they want this game.

 

Being conservative with numbers here but let's say in first 6 months of release we add another 50k ... number might be more but we're going to go on solid base here. If we added 200k and 50k stuck around that is a fairly safe number. So you have now a solid 100k, out of those let's say 1/3 is strictly single player/offline,

 

So we're at 65k players on the servers, diehards and people who just found the game to be f'n amazing. 

 

Out of that, who's gonna buy all the dlc? Probably not everyone. Maybe half MIGHT buy all of it, 1/4 is probably more realistic. Because even though everyone of the 65k may LOVE the game, they may not all love every dlc or want it. So 21k buy dlc ... that's not funding very much. It's certainly not funding future dlc beyond that because ... maintaining the game.

 

HOWEVER, if those 65k who absolutely love the game paid say $10 per month subscription (pretty normal for most online subscription games) that would maintain the servers, provide for some dlc (which then we could get as just added) and provide a profit which makes it worthwhile to continue.

 

Like I said, for all I know we could have much higher numbers than that as far as players. I'm going barebones here as in the worst case scenario. Either way, maintaining, supporting the game and providing future content all require funding.

well they wouldnt just release ONE jason dlc and be all like hey the money from this goes to map making no its more of they release 3-5 jasons as dlc and then the extra goes to map making and im pretty sure atleast half the community will buy these dlcs because about half the community are die hard f13 fans so of course they're gonna pay for the rest of the movies jason's so that's a half decent ammount of money maybe not quite enough for it but that's what backerkit is for (donations from fans to help fund shit)


tumblr_oj0jj7ttFT1rp0vkjo1_500.gif 

I'm about as stupid as most people online but not as stupid as this gif 


#55
ResolutionBlaze

ResolutionBlaze

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,111 posts
  • LocationMinnesota

yeah i agree jasonvswindows roy was almost just as strong as part 1-4 jason like how he could throw a body through a window or hold someones neck with one hand, that kind of thing, so as long as he doesn't hit someones head off or rip someones jaw off he'll be good.

 

Yeah but he can't eat up machete swings.  And knowing Roy isn't ACTUALLY Jason, that feels way too off for me.


I swear I'm not half as angry as I seem to be.

 

Please give me one star to help cure the new form of cancer called ResolutionBlaze

 

Check out Unlucky 7, rebooted after three long years of silence!  http://store.steampo...com/app/579120/


#56
Poetic_Injustice

Poetic_Injustice

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 71 posts
  • LocationCanada, EH?

Yeah but he can't eat up machete swings.  And knowing Roy isn't ACTUALLY Jason, that feels way too off for me.

yeah but the same goes for jason 3/4, jason almost died before because he had an ax to the head and did actually die when tommy killed him witht the machete. Even though jason can hold more hits he is still weak like roy.


  • JasonVsWindows likes this

#57
JasonVsWindows

JasonVsWindows

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Yeah but he can't eat up machete swings.  And knowing Roy isn't ACTUALLY Jason, that feels way too off for me.

 

I'm guessing your not a big fan of part 5 in the first place then. Unless in your mind you see this as Roy literally becoming Jason rather then just being Roy. 

 

Roy's ability's are on par with Jason's 2,3, and 4. Being a copycat killer it already makes sense why he would act like Jason and why people in game would think he is Jason.

 

I mean if you play a superhero game is it that big a deal if Spider-Man can be reskined as Scarlet-Spider or if Hulk can be Red Hulk or Ironman into War Machine.


  • bewareofbears likes this

200_s.gif#26


#58
bewareofbears

bewareofbears

    ;)

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 637 posts
  • Location: Crystal Lake
After the actual launch is a lot of big what-if's. They don't have any obligation to us other than maintaining the game that was backed by supporters. Whatever comes next is without the strings of Kickstarter and Backerkit attached.

My hope is they stay the course they've been on and add more stuff from the films- like Roy. ;)
f13sig_BEWARE.png

#59
TMSStoneaxe

TMSStoneaxe

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 194 posts

After the actual launch is a lot of big what-if's. They don't have any obligation to us other than maintaining the game that was backed by supporters. Whatever comes next is without the strings of Kickstarter and Backerkit attached.

My hope is they stay the course they've been on and add more stuff from the films- like Roy. ;)

actually they already said at pax they're planning dlc so they don't have to but it would be a kick to the balls of their playerbase size if they didnt


tumblr_oj0jj7ttFT1rp0vkjo1_500.gif 

I'm about as stupid as most people online but not as stupid as this gif 


#60
bewareofbears

bewareofbears

    ;)

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 637 posts
  • Location: Crystal Lake

actually they already said at pax they're planning dlc so they don't have to but it would be a kick to the balls of their playerbase size if they didnt


Yep, I'm aware- not sure you understood my post. No worries though.
f13sig_BEWARE.png




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users