Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Liva

  1. Quick question 1. Will there be any counselor customization (appearance wise) with just the base game, or will you need to get the Clothing Pack to have access to any kind of customization. ----- Edit: I'm also very sorry if these questions already have been answered, but I did a bit of searching and haven't been able to find any specific topics on it.
  2. So morph is the favorite kind of exploit right now for Jason killers, and they exploit the invulnerable Jason gets when morphing. - When you shoot him (in the head with a flare gun) or with a shotgun, and he morphs just in that moment he's free from damage, sometimes he can even morph a bit later, and the stun won't work. - When knocking Jason's mask off and you stun him with the sweater and are about to hit him he can morph out in that short second, becoming invulnerable, and therefore unkillable by Tommy and the girl with the sweater. (It's the same premise with the gun etc.) I say exploit because I don't believe that was how it was intended.
  3. So I have "counselor preference" when it comes to spawn preference, and I've just played 5 games, the two first I was selected to play Jason, even though there were people in the lobby that had Jason preference. the two games after that I played Counselor. And I were then selected Again to play as Jason. That's a 3/5 Jason, if I have Counselor preference, so I can only presume there's a bug so far? Since it doesn't really seem to do anything compared to what I choose for my spawn preferences.
  4. So I have picked "Counselor" in spawn preference because I like playing counselor far more than I like playing Jason, so much that I would actually rather not play Jason, still I'm given the Jason role time and time again, and when I was playing with my friend I asked if he also had picked "counselor" as spawn preference (since it would then make sense I would've had a chance to get it) But he said the complete opposite, that he had clicked "jason" preference, cause' he really liked playing Jason, and still I was forced to playing Jason, even though I didn't really enjoy it as much as he would. - So please, when someone clicks Counselor prefence, and they are in a match with someone who have clicked Jason preference or none, then let one of those play Jason. Let the preferences actually matter. - Also if a person has Jason as preference and the others (all of them, hypothetically) had counselor, let him get Jason every time, since that's his preference, don't force one of the counselors to play Jason. ------------------------------------- I find that picking a preference haven't really mattered so far, don't know if it's a bug (might be since it've still just been released) but I would like for that choice to matter more, even putting some people completely out of the "draw" if they rather play counselors than Jason, unless ofc. there's only counselor preferences, then a Jason should be drawn from that group, but so far I haven't seen that happen. And it does annoy me too, I know a lot of people want to play Jason, and I really don't, same with my brother, but we're still forced into the role now and again. I feel the tools are in there already, they just aren't working properly :/
  5. I don't really have a problem with the grab kill, but one thing I think needs to be addressed and hopefully changed is: - Jason should not be able to grap a counselor if the counselor is in combat stance and isn't damaged. That's the only thing I would like to see changed because right now the combat stance is pretty useless, sure you can get some hits in on a new Jason, but once they know the grap the combat stance becomes a bit useless. (Also I think they should award environmental kills more than just the 4 ones they can do everywhere, that way hopefully the Jason's won't just cheese it with the "rip throat out" kill on every counselor, or just hit them 3 times with an attack. (Which I've seen quite a few do) Jason can also go into combat stance and can dodge.
  6. True, it would be lovely to be able to match A.J's skirt with Deborah's shoes etc. Then they wouldn't need to "model" new outfits, they would just need to "fit" them to the other character's rigs. Also I could def' see Vanessa wearing what Tiffany is wearing without it destroying the "trope" they've put her in. Same with Adam and Brandon etc. or Eric wearing Kenny's shirt.
  7. Okay so it've been some time since I was on the forums, so I'm sorry for quoting posts that are a bit further back. I think the reason people state why they're upset etc. is because the devs etc. doesn't really seem to care or tries to justify what they did, without apologizing for their very shady behavior done towards the people purchasing the clothing DLC: - So if you ever pay anything under 9 bucks they couldn't care less, because it's only 9 bucks. If I went up and bought a menu stating some fries, and for 9 dollars extra I could get a burger, which I then buy and when the order comes I was handed fries with two buns, I would feel ripped off too, especially if I went up and said that hey, wtf. why did I only get two buns, and all they said is that 9 dollars is nothing, so they can't sympathize with me. Really? And for 6 dollars I could get a cola and onion rings or some sizzle (strong use of metaphors) Let's look at it in a realistic view: Savini Jason got: - Entirely new model - New texture - Special particle effects (Fire/eyes) - Unique Soundtrack/music - New Weapon which was also modeled and textured. - New animation Let's look at what the clothing DLC got: - 90 new textures. To give a good indication, there are 300 textures wearable in the base game. which means that the DLC will be + 30% to that number. Now I would've been fine with this had they stated that that the clothing dlc would be new textures, not "Unique Clothing that fits each character's trope" I did expect to see a new model which was then textured, I know re-texturing models is not a big deal, and it's not very hard to do at all. Rigging something might take a bit of time sure, but texturing is basically just take the base texture and then colour it over, it's not the most advanced thing in the world. And for "not being able to find clothes for Vanessa's trope" leg warmers. Any with an oversized t-shirt (most things were oversized or really slim) I really do doubt that could be used as an excuse. I feel more than let down, I feel like I was hinted at much more which was then not delivered, and then the devs and such can just back up and be like "Well it's your own fault because you put your faith in us, and it's only 9 dollars so your feelings/opinion doesn't matter" I still do like the game, but trust is easily lost, and how you handle a situation can dictate a lot, going out and apologizing can go a long way instead of all the "It's your own fault, and you were actually only donating, it was more of a badge of honor" is just a bad excuse. That's at least how I feel right now.
  8. It already have a penalty, it gives a -200 penalty. This is a survival game where you have the goal of surviving. I've killed 1 person total so far by accident, but it's a survival game, not a coop us against Jason. There are only 2 seats in the boat or 2/4 seats in the car, there're many legit reasons you would want to "slow down" your fellow counselor, even kill them if they withhold the keys to the car, but refuge to go there. I don't think it's that big a problem that you make it up to be, same with the people talking about Jason being too overpowered. They could probably do away with the circles (where you can see where the other counselors are on the map) that is the furthest I would go to stop it. That way people who try to survive won't instantly run towards you because they know you're there.
  9. Why no release date

    Don't forget that it's 3,2 gb but without the singleplayer (they're going to patch the singleplayer in)
  10. From Friday The 13th the game's twitter. When asked what the counselor clothing dlc was: "It was for custom clothing for counselors and was stand-alone"
  11. If we go back to my original question of this topic, then Splatterhouse answered: "1. Clothing customisation will be in the base game, I believe it'll be a colour palette change of existing clothes. " That was the answer to my question: "1. Will there be any counselor customization (appearance wise) with just the base game, or will you need to get the Clothing Pack to have access to any kind of customization."
  12. Let's not jump to any conclusions yet guys and girls. This doesn't really tell us too much, I think he means something completely different, and here's why: " " <-- we know the character model is naked, aka. the character model was modeled naked, not with clothes on as some might think. So that means that every piece of clothing is a separate piece of model etc. that is then put on the character, "tied to the character model/rig" which is also why sometimes in the beta you could see those black "glitches" where the clothes collided and cut through the characters, if the clothes was "modeled on" the model that would mean that you most likely wouldn't see that as there would be no collision So relax guys, he's just saying that clothing is tied to character model/rig, although you would need to show me the exact question before I start to worry, because as far as I was aware, clothing "patterns" aka. the reskins were unlock-able in the game, and not the "counselor clothing dlc"
  13. You're somewhat right, so the men's swimwear would continue to become smaller and smaller till it reached its peak in 1970's then it would slowly begin to become longer etc. It's important to note that a lot of people still wore the very very small pieces of swimwear in the 80's, while the majority slowly would take the fashion trend of a "bit" longer shorts, remember, these weren't even reaching half thigh down, though more and more would pick up the trend till it reached just above the knees in the 90's where it did stay through the 2000, and then would shrink back again to mid thigh in 2015 etc. But it's worth mentioning that while the "longer" shorts did become popular in the 90's the "speedos" so to say, didn't really die out like a lot of the earlier swimwear from say the 1920 and such. So the 80's where the first Friday the 13th Films are based is a really hard place for fashion since it's the first time the swimwear becomes longer, but it's still very short, we also see some swimwear in the movie But it really depends on where you are in the world (as fashion is very different from place to place.) Why would Samantha go out and swim in the middle of the nigh (Friday the 13th The Final Chapter) ;P But a lot of people like to swim a bit at night, it's not unheard of. Also JyusannichiKibou l don't think Deborah or AJ etc. would really need a swimsuit, as you don't need to give everyone swimsuits, Sara doesn't go skinny dipping with the others afterall,
  14. <--- The heels had to be at least 7 cm high.
  15. Running shoes also have a bit of heel. So running in heels isn't that much of a stretch, unless it's the really tall ones, but they weren't "that" popular in the 80's. Edit: And let's not forget, Tiffany isn't going to run a marathon here, at most I would call it a sprint, none of them are really running long distance. (and short distance is very possible in heels)
  16. Breakable Fences

    Will some of the broken bits be "weapons" like a board that a counselor can pick up and try to dash Jason with? though I imagine that would be hard to do too, but as an incentive not to destroy every fence you come across as Jason just to "get them out of the way", then again, a board / weapon wouldn't necessarily be too strong either xP
  17. That would be really cool, but I fear that they'll probably need to buy the license, and I don't imagine that would be cheap :/
  18. I liked the idea that you could purchase 1 character at the start, with maybe a form of "point" system, that way you could get any of the characters and start playing as them. And then you would slowly unlock them as you go, kinda like in League of Legends I believe, where you start out with IP to unlock a champion or two and then work your way up there (probably not with the big difference in points for each character, but where each character costs the same) and then you can unlock them as you go. At least you'll start out playing a character you like, and there won't be the "characters you unlock later will be more op" feeling to it
  19. Okay Robert England, if you haven't read the forum rules, which I presume you haven't, I'll just show some important ones: General Rule of Thumb: Remember the golden rule; please treat others as you would wish to be treated by others within this community. We are all members here, we all wish to be treated nicely, and we all want to have a good time here. Trolling/Flaming/Bashing: Bashing, excessive trolling and general negativity is something this forum expressly wishes to leave out within this community, while we can understand general horsing around between members, we encourage the community to look out for one another. We enjoy and encourage joking, but we ask you keep it at a reasonable level. Please be mindful of what you say and how you treat others. General Disagreements: Debates are going to happen, people will disagree. We ask you keep it civil and remember that everyone has an opinion, everyone has their personal experiences and not all of us are the same. We encourage in-depth analysis, point/counter-point debates, but we stress that you refrain from entering the land of hate speech and flaming/trolling. Passing that line is when staff steps in. What we're saying is; be rational. ----------------------------------- Now there's also the rules for the general discussion forum: If it has to do with the game and Friday the 13th, post away! let's look at the first thing you contributed to this post/discussion: > Robert England Posted 05 April 2017 - 01:33 AM Triggered much That didn't sound very constructive or partaking of the debate/discussion Ikarikh and Bewareofbears had going, nor did it sound like it had anything to do with Ft13th, which is weird as the forum rules seem pretty clear on this subject when it comes to the use of the general discussion <-- discussion, not bashing. But let's move on: > Robert England Posted 05 April 2017 - 02:19 AM I was referring to ikarikh he does it on every post hes on he just gos off. Im saying Hes trigger because of his bs comments of girls being sexualized in every game sounds like a sjw to me. Its a video game get over it if they want them to be big butts on both guys/girls who cares. The first thing you do is bash Ikarikh by saying "he gos off" while giving no quotes or indication of where that's shown, so far Ikarikh haven't seen to be going off at all, on the contrary he seems much more civil than most people I've come across on the forums. I don't find his comments about girls being sexualized as bs, I find it quite true, and I agree with him, I would love to see guys being sexualized too like they are in the movies (friday the 13th) ofc. SJW, ah, a lovely term to throw at people, just like all the other terms that's good for insulting people. Also "it's a video game, get over it, if they want them to be big butts on both guys/girls who cares" I don't know if you know Robert England, but we're actually on a "general discussion" forum, and believe it or not, but we actually discuss stuff about the game. *surprise* > Robert England Posted 05 April 2017 - 11:08 PM I looked up some of youre post you do cry about it alot and he didnt say he was against it snowflake just it got fucked up fast. Once again triggered much P.s if that makes it personal then dont post somewhere everyone else can see dm it to him. And all games dont do that, you're train of thought is cancer to gaming culture youre a gamergate person huh? And going off doesnt have to be derected at someone just going off 1. I presume snowflake is a name you've thrown on Ikarikh. I would like to direct you to the forum rules about bashing, and I must say, I've found most if not all your comment so far very distasteful towards Ikarikh, common curtsy is a thing, and so far you've not shown that at all. 2. Going so far as calling people's thought "cancer" is a new low. If someone disagrees with you you just bash them and call them cancer? if you don't know how discussions work then I would suggest you don't post on the general discussion thread. > Robert England Posted Yesterday, 01:09 AM Lol ok you're entitled to youre point of view even if its wrong and ignorant. I cant argue with stupidity "It's hard winning an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person" You've done nothing but bashing, not giving any links or quotes to support your opinion, your opinion is "simply" right, only because it's the one you have, and therefore everyone else must be wrong. ------------------------------- I'm surprised no moderator/admin or even other people haven't gone in and stopped you, because plainly put the only thing you're contributing to this discussion is bashing and negativity, none of it which is constructive or related to the topic. You're entitled to your own opinion, but so too is everyone else (without being called cancer or ignorant/stupid.) if you can't do then, then I suggest you don't post at all.
  20. I'm mostly with SombodyFancy on this one Don't usually play a lot of male characters (mostly because they're always very muscular, so don't really relate) but they're nice to look at ;D While the girl characters just seem more my alley xD Though I would prefer Deborah, Jenny and AJ over the other 2 But I could see myself picking Tiffany. I'm not too keen on playing Vanessa, mostly because I'm a fashion slut when it comes to customization and clothing, so I'll always prefer more of the "prettier" clothing, but not necessarily the practical. ((So far I'm def' going for A.J.))
  21. I have the same concerns as a lot of other people when it comes to the traps and the "meta-game" of it all. I would love it if traps are more unpredictably placed than just "repetitively placed" in front of the car/phone etc. So I would make it so that if you have a weapon you can "attack" in the direction and hit the ground, kinda like AJ's attack animation was sometimes (I think some of the other counselors had the same attack animation) where they would swing the weapon vertical and it would hit the ground directly in-front of them. In the process destroying the trap and the weapon would be stuck or destroyed. This would make it so people would need to spot it first, so if Jason is placing it very obvious places like in front of the car/phone etc. It would be very easy to "disable" them. But also making it so you would need to attack and not click on a button coming up, so we don't see people creep around and the moment they see the ability to press a button (because a trap is nearby) they can disable it, but they'll actually need to know where it is and hit it with that weapon.
  22. Oh my god yes please! xD "Throwing that out there." Both in a metaphorical and physical sense hur hur
  23. The goal hopefully involves us being fashionable campers ;> since it is a "clothing pack" after all. I'm just hopeing for some skirts for the girls, then I'll be a happy counselor
  24. so in the 1980's men actually wore speedos and such, as the "thongs, g-string etc. was introduced into 'fashion'" so to speak. It wasn't up until the 1990's that men began wearing swim trunks and boardshorts. (and most of the Friday the 13th movies are in the 1980's ) Though it should be noted that some in throughout the 80's chose to opt for preppier styles that were longer and resembled the silhouette of boxer shorts, but speedos was very much still the "go to" swimwear for men :9